Pro se federal litigation · 2019–2026
Every contradiction.
On the record.
A pro se federal-record archive. Vast federal sums fund a Massachusetts "protection" apparatus whose operative effect is to force its protected indigent homeless litigants to incriminate themselves on the federal record, and then to deny them — by administrative mailing-out conduct alone — the ordinary appellate-clock remedies that would let them complain.
The pattern is older than the docket: "show me the man, and I’ll show you the crime" (Beria). The contemporary federal-record version is documented in the 5/12/2026 Emergency Motion for Injunction Pending Appeal at the First Circuit.
Active federal dockets
Questions presented
Does sovereign immunity apply to a Commonwealth when federal funds subsidize the forceful separation of American children from their parents?
Does "double protecting" some citizens waive Constitutional protections for all others?
Can Congress avoid overriding a state's immunity when presented with Civil RICO claims alleging deliberate civil-rights violations?
Has a state self-abrogated sovereign immunity by deliberately obstructing continued attempts to appeal?
Evidence archive
Public-safe redactions of correspondence to the Court, the Executive, and the agencies whose mandates the record implicates.
Under construction RoutineThematic cross-cut on the documented pattern of obstruction. Refresh in progress; ships 6/1/2026.
Under construction RacketeeringCivil RICO thematic cross-cut: predicate acts, enterprise, pattern. Refresh in progress; ships 6/1/2026.
Under construction RetaliationsThematic cross-cut on retaliation evidence and "unfree-labor" framing. Refresh in progress; ships 6/1/2026.