Pro se federal litigation · 2019–2026
Every contradiction.
On the record.
On May 19, 2026, the Massachusetts Appeals Court affirmed the dismissal of a pro se civil-rights complaint on Mass. R. A. P. 16(a)(9)(A) waiver grounds (No. 2025-P-0855) — on a record that, as the filed affidavits set out, the Family Court had already emptied: a 437-item request for admissions truncated to two docket pages, and three certified hearing transcripts first denied, then delayed, before they entered the record in a four-volume, 389-page set stamped received May 21, 2026. Motions to correct that record are pending before the Massachusetts Appeals Court, and the appeal is at the First Circuit (No. 26-1346).
A June 17, 2026 supplemental status affidavit, filed under 28 U.S.C. § 1746 and seeking no relief, reports a further development now part of the record before the court: the same categorical identification bar — the subject of a civil-rights complaint filed with, and now pending before, the Massachusetts Attorney General’s Civil Rights Division on June 16, 2026 — which, the affidavit states, forecloses not only lawful employment but every lawful means of receiving money.
Nothing here has been adjudicated in the litigant’s favor; every statement is what the filings assert and the public dockets show, each linking to a filed page a reader can pull and check, with the contested questions still pending.
Federal & civil-rights record
Questions presented
Does sovereign immunity apply to a Commonwealth when federal funds subsidize the forceful separation of American children from their parents?
Does "double protecting" some citizens waive Constitutional protections for all others?
Can Congress avoid overriding a state's immunity when presented with Civil RICO claims alleging deliberate civil-rights violations?
Evidence archive
Public-safe redactions of correspondence to the Court, the Executive, and the agencies whose mandates the record implicates.
6 entries RoutineThematic cross-cut on the recurring record-emptying mechanism the filed affidavits describe — truncation, same-day rule reversals, the no-PO-Box rule. Asserted-and-pending; correction motions pending.
5 entries RacketeeringCivil RICO theory as pleaded — predicate acts, alleged enterprise, pattern, § 1964(c) injury — dismissed with prejudice below on res judicata grounds, now on appeal (No. 26-1346).
5 entries RetaliationsRetaliation and civil-rights-deprivation theory the filings assert — §§ 1981/1983/1985, the categorical-ID-bar deprivation chain — raised in the dismissed-and-appealed complaint; asserted-and-pending.