Pro se federal litigation · 2019–2026
Every contradiction.
On the record.
On May 19, 2026, the Massachusetts Appeals Court affirmed the dismissal of a pro se civil-rights complaint on the ground that "absolute immunity applies," and on the same page directed the litigant to "seek review by the United States Supreme Court" (No. 2025-P-0855) — on a record that, as the filed affidavits set out, the Family Court had already emptied: a 437-item request for admissions truncated to two docket pages, and three certified hearing transcripts first denied, then delayed, before they entered the record in a four-volume, 389-page set stamped received May 21, 2026. Motions to correct that record are pending before the Family Court and the Massachusetts Appeals Court, and the appeal is at the First Circuit (No. 26-1346).
A June 17, 2026 supplemental status affidavit, filed under 28 U.S.C. § 1746 and seeking no relief, reports a further development now part of the record before the court: the same categorical identification bar — the subject of a civil-rights complaint filed with, and now pending before, the Massachusetts Attorney General’s Civil Rights Division on June 16, 2026 — which, the affidavit states, forecloses not only lawful employment but every lawful means of receiving money.
Nothing here has been adjudicated in the litigant’s favor; every statement is what the filings assert and the public dockets show, each linking to a filed page a reader can pull and check, with the contested questions still pending.
Federal dockets
Questions presented
Does sovereign immunity apply to a Commonwealth when federal funds subsidize the forceful separation of American children from their parents?
Does "double protecting" some citizens waive Constitutional protections for all others?
Can Congress avoid overriding a state's immunity when presented with Civil RICO claims alleging deliberate civil-rights violations?
Has a state self-abrogated sovereign immunity by deliberately obstructing continued attempts to appeal?
Evidence archive
Public-safe redactions of correspondence to the Court, the Executive, and the agencies whose mandates the record implicates.
6 entries RoutineThematic cross-cut on the recurring record-emptying mechanism the filed affidavits describe — truncation, same-day rule reversals, the no-PO-Box rule. Asserted-and-pending; correction motions pending.
5 entries RacketeeringCivil RICO theory as pleaded — predicate acts, alleged enterprise, pattern, § 1964(c) injury — dismissed with prejudice below on res judicata grounds, now on appeal (No. 26-1346).
5 entries RetaliationsRetaliation and civil-rights-deprivation theory the filings assert — §§ 1981/1983/1985, the categorical-ID-bar deprivation chain — raised in the dismissed-and-appealed complaint; asserted-and-pending.