The Gulag is recognized as a major instrument of political repression in the former Soviet Union. It was the government agency in charge of the network of forced labor camps.
Version 0.4.0
A Marxist “Equity-Based” Justice Fundamentally Subverts Our Constitution.
In the case of an “LGBTQ+” (but in actuality only driven to “maximize federal reimbursements” using children) Massachusetts, our Constitutional civil rights and explicit federal antidiscrimination statutes always come secondary to any inherently contradictory and incoherent (but lucrative) “feminist equities.”
500+ Open LettersTo solve Russell's Paradox (carelessly introduced by The White House by allowing the enumeration of purposely non-inclusive LGBTQ+ alphabet soup of “specially protect from others” groups without ever mentioning the always inherently present “leftovers”), the above deliberately deceitful “equity for all” must be corrected to a mere “equity for some,” in contradiction with our U.S. Constitution.
"It's on purpose! The laws are unclear for a reason. Because everybody is a criminal. So anybody can be arrested at any moment ..." -- The Gulag: What we know now and why it matters.
The Commonwealth of Massachusetts aims to “double protect” some citizens at the expense of revoking all protections from others, including Constitutional rights. Does “double protecting” some waive Constitutional protections for all?
RoutineThe “Sec. 8. Affirmatively Advancing Civil Rights … to prevent and address discrimination and advance equity for all” clause of the 2/16/2023 Executive Order results in the “equity for rich or equity for poor mother?” dilemma as “equity for all” is impossible by the Marxist design. Is the mandate to selectively “advance equity” (for only a select few) Constitutional?
Can the U.S. Congress avoid overriding a state’s immunity when presented with such Civil RICO claims that specifically imply deliberate violations of civil rights?
Has a state self-abrogated its sovereign immunity by deliberately sabotaging continued attempts to appeal rulings?
RacketeeringDoes sovereign immunity apply to an “LGBTQ+” Massachusetts when using federal funds to subsidize forceful separation and activist agenda-driven alienation of our innocent American children from their American parents?
Could a sadistic zoo keeper use massive federal assistance to endlessly poke and torture their bleeding caged animals until their openly public collapse?
Yet Father, who was used to the communist “weaponized psychology,” never turned violent, avoided succumbing to depression, never became sick, and most importantly, never gave up hope despite his deliberately induced full indigency.
RetaliationsFather meticulously documented already in 2017: “While MSPCC was destroyed with our cases, [Ms. G.] provided emotional insights into the secretive 'supervised visitation meetings' by 'man-hating feminists': no men were allowed at the meetings, the agenda was strictly exclusionary, nobody escaped supervision, and the protocols were designed to maximize humiliation 'like you would imagine in a Nazi meeting.’”