Pro se federal litigation · 2019–2026

Every contradiction.
On the record.

On May 19, 2026, the Massachusetts Appeals Court affirmed the dismissal of a pro se civil-rights complaint on the ground that "absolute immunity applies," and on the same page directed the litigant to "seek review by the United States Supreme Court" (No. 2025-P-0855). The federal questions the state courts declined to reach — due process, equal protection, and the First Amendment right to petition the government — are, by the Commonwealth’s own instruction, left for the Supreme Court to review.

The panel reached that result on a record the Family Court had already emptied: a 437-item request for admissions truncated, across six 2025 e-filing dates, from 77-to-81-page envelopes to two docket pages. The one set of evidence the panel did not have — three certified hearing transcripts — the Family Court first denied, then delayed past its decision. On May 21, 2026, those transcripts entered the record in a 389-page stamped submission to the Appeals Court; they corroborate the erasures. The sixth petition for certiorari puts that complete record before the Court.

Q1 SCOTUS

Does sovereign immunity apply to a Commonwealth when federal funds subsidize the forceful separation of American children from their parents?

Q2 SCOTUS

Does "double protecting" some citizens waive Constitutional protections for all others?

Q3 USCA1

Can Congress avoid overriding a state's immunity when presented with Civil RICO claims alleging deliberate civil-rights violations?

Q4 D. Mass.

Has a state self-abrogated sovereign immunity by deliberately obstructing continued attempts to appeal?