Racketeer-Enforced “Feminist Equity”-Based Justice Subverts Our Anti-Discrimination Statutes
Due to now substantiated systemic and
sustained violations of my civil rights
by a ruthlessly conspiring state, it
has become impossible for me to secure
ANY employment (the number of submitted
compliant job applications that I have
submitted is 1,680+ so far).
As Emailed
- an abbreviated and redacted copy.
An “LGBTQ+” Massachusetts Ruthlessly Profiteers From Child-Abusive “Pseudo-Science”
My “no equity whatsoever” group does exist, as the corrupt child predator GALs forcefully assigned to my cases assisted the Massachusetts Family Courts in more than 1,500 other cases. Even if I pick an “alphabet soup” letter for this group, e.g., “X,” it is still not enumerated in any “LGBTQ+…” grouping, or specifically, in President Biden’s 2/16/2023 “Executive Order on Further Advancing Racial Equity and Support for Underserved Communities Through The Federal Government.” If the Presidential intent was to fully and truly include all Americans, our already shining U.S. Constitution would have sufficed.
There is a lot of provocative chatter on the current national pre-election scene, like “Anti-racism is racism.” None of these offer an actual proof. Using the venerable Russell’s Paradox, “the most famous of the logical or set-theoretical paradoxes,” I can prove that President Biden’s above anti-discriminatory order is not just discriminatory but also deliberately deceiving, inconsistent, and purposely ambiguating.
I am one of those excluded representatives, i.e., belonging to the “men who cannot ever get pregnant, are forcefully separated from their dear children, and are stripped of any constitutional rights.”
Notice Of Appeal Pursuant To Presidential Order Creating A Marxist “American Gulag”
Pursuant to President Biden’s 2/16/2023 Executive Order, I respectfully appeal the EEOC’s above decision. The executive order instructs, “Sec. 8. Affirmatively Advancing Civil Rights. Agencies shall comprehensively use their respective civil rights authorities and offices to prevent and address discrimination and advance equity for all.” I can now prove to the U.S. Supreme Court that a self-referencing (or recursive) “equity for all” leads to a famous and fundamental paradox inherent in all the Marxist (and Communist) “specially protect from others” divisive social engineering ideologies.
To solve Russell’s Paradox (carelessly introduced by The White House by allowing the enumeration of the purposely non-inclusive LGBTQ+ alphabet soup of “specially protect from others” groups without ever mentioning the always inherently present “leftovers”), the “equity for all” must be corrected to a mere “equity for some” in direct contradiction with our Constitution. As “we can infer anything from a contradiction,” the Presidential Contradiction must be solved less our entire “rule of law” is invalidated.
Until then, federal agencies must consider the inherent consequences of any “progressive” Marxist (and Communist) “equity-based” (but merely zero-sum) justice, especially the fact that the naive enumeration of all “protected classes” leads to the implied creation of a new “American Gulag” for all the “leftover” Americans that cannot ever be “specially protected from others” and are therefore eternally silenced and enslaved. I am a proper representative “forced employee” of such federal American Gulag “employer,” as I work every day under the direct threat of detention without any compensation or simple protection.
Racketeer-Enforced “Feminist Equity”-Based Justice Subverts Our Anti-Discrimination Statutes
On its website, the U.S. Department of Labor states that “Equal Employment Opportunity (EEO) laws prohibit specific types of job discrimination in certain workplaces. The U.S. Department of Labor (DOL) has two agencies which deal with EEO monitoring and enforcement, the Civil Rights Center and the Office of Federal Contract Compliance Programs.” I have already filed/emailed my complaints to both.
Therefore, I am renewing my complaints pursuant to “The Age Discrimination Act of 1975 prohibits discrimination on the basis of age in programs and activities receiving federal financial assistance. The Act, which applies to all ages, permits the use of certain age distinctions and factors other than age that meet the Act’s requirements. The Age Discrimination Act is enforced by the Civil Rights Center.”
Class Action Complaint For Relief And Damages
Dear Attorney General Merrick B. Garland,
Pursuant to the below listed Federal statutes, I am respectfully giving notice by this herein registered mail that I intend to commence the attached action, titled:
Class Action Complaint For Relief And Damages – Violations of Title VI/VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (42 U.S.C. §§ 2000d/e, et seq.), Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967 (29 U.S.C. § 621, et seq.), Age Discrimination Act of 1975 (42 U.S.C. §§ 6101 - 6107), deprivation of civil rights (42 U.S.C. §§ 1981, 1983, and 1985), and systemic/sustained Civil RICO (18 U.S.C. § 1962) prohibited activities,
in the U.S. District Court, District of Massachusetts, on or about November 1, 2023.