Extreme Parental Alienation Should Be Considered Child Abuse And Referred Criminally
"While MSPCC was destroyed with our cases,
[Ms. G.] provided emotional insights into
the secretive ‘supervised visitation
meetings’ by ‘man-hating feminists’: no
men were allowed at the meetings, the
agenda was strictly exclusionary, nobody
escaped supervision, and the protocols
were designed to maximize humiliation
'like you would imagine a Nazi meeting.'"
As Mailed
- an abbreviated and redacted copy.
Extreme Parental Alienation Should Be Considered Child Abuse And Referred Criminally
In my previous open letter to the White House, dated November 19, 2023, I indicated my intentions to submit my third pro se and forma pauperis petition for a writ of certiorari to the U.S. Supreme Court. My petition was duly docketed on December 29, 2023, as No. 23-6398 with the following question:
- The “Sec. 8. Affirmatively Advancing Civil Rights … to prevent and address discrimination and advance equity for all” clause of the 2/16/2023 Presidential Executive Order results in the predictable “equity for the rich or equity for the poor mother?” dilemma as “equity for all” is impossible by Marxist design. Is the mandate to selectively “advance equity” (for a select few) Constitutional?
In my previous open letter, I mentioned my pro se Civil RICO Class Action Complaint, 1:23-cv-12692-PBS. Seemingly as retaliation, the substantiated complaint was again summarily dismissed with 16 direct misrepresentations of my specific facts. I took my second chance to formally ask [the federal question]:
- Does sovereign immunity apply to an “LGBTQ+” Massachusetts when using federal funds to subsidize the forceful separation and activist agenda-driven alienation of innocent American children from their loving American parents?
As Mailed
- an abbreviated and redacted copy.
Predatory Feminism Ends In “Equity For Rich Vs. Poor Mother (And Her Children)” Dilemma
The Family Court unexpectedly allowed me to remotely attend my younger children’s “name change” hearing on the same day. I already walked the grueling ~26 miles in March. I am also grateful to the Judge for allowing me to express my ambivalent feelings about “name changes.” On the one hand, I am not guided by an activist-feminist “patriarchy” concept about forcing women to “give up their identity.” I have been married twice, and I never even thought about requiring my wives to “share my identity.”
As an “ethnically cleansed” hated minority from a Marxist tyranny, I am painfully aware of the emotional torture that forcing someone to change their names (their most fundamental and also psychologically ever-present identity) means, especially to children. I was one of those “brainwashed” children whose name “just wasn’t good enough.” The crucial distinction, once again, is being forced.
I have now compiled extensive records of the deliberately falsified Family Court docket entries and the proofs of committed mail fraud. These were deliberate acts to conceal the transfer of “feminist equity” from the “rich” mother to the “poor” mother. Using the fraudulent (but astronomically lucrative for the “LGBTQ+” State and the million-dollar lawyers) “feminist equity,” the Family Court issued strict and comprehensive orders to forcefully separate the “poor” mother’s children from their father as well.
The “feminist equity” transferring Family Court orders were so ad hoc and careless that they ensured that I could never have any unsupervised contact whatsoever with my younger children. Since my younger daughter was not even born when the activist Family Court implemented the predatory feminist agenda, the only reason my younger children feel the way they do is the State’s “LGBTQ+” agenda.
As Mailed
- an abbreviated and redacted copy.
The White House Capitulates With Deceitful “Equity For All” Marxist Agenda
I can only speculate about the intentions of the Family Court (or the Commonwealth of Massachusetts). With my in-arrears child support obligations now at the impossible $360,000+ level and my desperate job applications soon reaching 1,800+ compliant submissions, these matters have transcended from a “feminist” problem (i.e., between the two sexes) to a deeply seated genuine social injustice problem.
In my third SCOTUS petition, and in the context of the [Family Court’s] falsified docket entries, my inquiry boils down to a binary decision between “equity for rich” v. “equity for poor” mother as “equity for all” is impossible by Marxist design. Appealing from a federal adjudicatory body, the Presidential Executive Order is binding.
As Mailed
- an abbreviated and redacted copy.
Please Protect Our Constitution From Marxist “Silent Insurrection”
My petition explicitly contrasts the fabricated feminist “women never lie” equity with one’s “ultimate” equity, i.e., one’s true “identity,” that is, one’s unique constitutionally protected personal experiences. In the context of our Constitution and our antidiscrimination statutes, it points to the need to prioritize all possible equities, even all arbitrarily made-up ones. I succeeded in constructing and filing the petition.
But I am alone, i.e., infinitely weak and quickly silenced and enslaved, especially by the Commonwealth of Massachusetts. Being our de facto feminist leader, who solemnly swore to protect our Constitution, if you believe that the feminist “women never lie” equity should not arbitrarily override and subvert our Constitution, please consider helping my petition with an Amicus Curiae filed with the Supreme Court.