Skip to content

Deceptive “Equity For All” Is Impossible By Marxist Design

"It's on purpose! The laws are unclear
for a reason. Because everybody is a
criminal. So anybody can be arrested
at any moment ... They've always
violated something because the laws
are badly written, and they seem to be
written that way on purpose."

Yale University - Anne Applebaum: The Gulag: What We Know Now and Why It Matters (at 1:19:11 to 1:21:10).

As Mailed

  • an abbreviated and redacted copy.

SCOTUS Status Affidavit On Continued Statutory Discriminations And Retaliations

In his petition, Father substantiated the preserved controversy from the lower courts as a “dogmatic interplay” to subvert justice based on merit and replace it with justice based on a more convenient (but also superficial) group identity.

Specifically, discounting Father’s factual claims of systemic discrimination, the lower courts endorsed the open deception by the State that “[Father’s] Title VII claim is defective because he is not an employee of any of the Commonwealth Defendants,” despite the established precedent, i.e.,

  • “Reasoning that Title VII was intended to prohibit employers ‘from exerting any power [they] may have to foreclose, on invidious grounds, access by any individual to employment opportunities otherwise available to him,’ the court concluded that the statute did not contemplate providing protections only in those situations where there was a direct employment relationship between the plaintiff and defendant, i.e., that of ‘an employee of an employer.’ The court held that, although the defendant was not the plaintiff’s ‘actual [or] potential direct employer,’ the complaint alleged sufficient facts to state a claim against one ‘who control[s] access to … employment and who den[ies] … access by reference to invidious criteria.’ Sibley Memorial Hosp. v. Wilson, 488 F.2d 1338 (D.C.Cir.1973) at 1342,” Lopez v. Commonwealth, 463 Mass. 696, 703 (Mass. 2012).

Secretive “Gatekeeper Orders” Serve The Political Agenda

And contrary to the allowed trivialization by the Family Court, see the trial transcripts, the Secret Police in communist tyrannies did not formally arrest their targets. The Secret Police came at night and operated just like the Family Court does by setting traps, resorting to informal house arrests, and using endless cruel psychological torture. And by leveraging the loved ones.

This shared agenda is captured precisely by the [trial] transcript:

  • “But don’t you agree that he needs to accept his [PURPOSE FABRICATED] role in what happened to the children to understand how to change his behavior?"

  • [Activist “Feminist” Harvard] GAL: Yes, I do."

Father was the ideal candidate for activist “reprogramming.” He was from Romania, and as per Hillary Clinton: “‘The Government Has No Business’ In Abortion Decisions. We are not Romania,” and “I’ve been to countries where governments forced women to bear children like they used to do in Romania.”

Note: Father is a deeply apolitical and fiercely independent software engineer with absolutely no political affiliations nor any interests in politics or any “activisms.”

For more detail see The Federal RICO Act