Skip to content

Discriminatory And Retaliatory “Unfree Labor”

Unfree labor includes all forms of slavery,
penal labor and the corresponding institutions,
such as debt slavery, serfdom, corvée and
labor camps.

Forced labor, or unfree labor, is any work relation, especially in modern or early modern history, in which people are employed against their will with the threat of destitution, detention, violence including death, or other forms of extreme hardship to either themselves or members of their families.

Two massive systems of unfree labor arose, a world apart from each other, in the late sixteenth and early seventeenth centuries. The American enslavement of blacks and the Russian subjection of serfs (“white slaves”) flourished in different ways and varying degrees.

As Emailed

  • an abbreviated and redacted copy.

Affidavit And Memorandum Of Law On Continued Systemic Discriminations And Retaliations

On 12/18/2023, I submitted my motion for leave and petition to the [Massachusetts] Supreme Judicial Court. Conclusive proof for the State deploying forced separation and extreme parental alienation of children as sustained statutory (G.L.c. 151B) retaliations came only on 1/10/2024 when the Probation Officer confirmed to me upon the Family Court orders that my minor children felt so alienated and so utterly “fatherless” that they wanted to change even their names. These are my “State-owned” children who never had contact with their loving father outside of the agenda-driven and deliberately retaliatory “supervised visitations.”

To substantiate my comprehensive G.L. c. 151B claims, I would like to extend my petition with the attached Status Affidavit And Memorandum Of Law On Continued Systemic Discriminations And Retaliations and exhibits.

As Emailed

  • an abbreviated and redacted copy.

Emergency Petition To Correct And Prevent Ongoing Errors

A defining feature of Marxism is that the State is tasked to “specially protect from others” selectively, instead of “equally protect rights” but universally.

Father belongs to and represents the “men who cannot ever get pregnant, are forcefully separated from their dear children, and are stripped of any constitutional rights,” a stereotypically fabricated “guilty until proven innocent” convenient grouping.

Father is, therefore, a member of a necessary “left-over group” (after the “specially protect from others” equity-based mandates have all been applied).

Consequently, Father’s preserved legal matters also highlight the intractable problems inherent in Marxist “equity-based” justice: the need to prioritize all arbitrary agenda-driven yet possible “equities.”

“Equity For All” is impossible by Marxist design as the crudely destructive redistribution of already existing wealth is the fundamental objective of the social construct and not the construction of wealth.

“Double Protection” vs. No Protection At All

“Father is a ‘person’ pursuant to Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. § 2000d, et seq., (‘Title VI’), and State is a Child Support Enforcement: Program Basics, (‘CSE’), ‘recipient’ of Federal financial assistance, i.e., ’the program is a federal-state matching grant program under which states must spend money in order to receive federal funding.’

Pursuant to the Age Discrimination Act of 1975, 42 U.S.C. §§ 6101-6107, (‘ADA’), Father is again a ‘person,’ while State violates the “no person in the United States shall, on the basis of age, be excluded from participation in, be denied the benefits of, or be subjected to discrimination under, any program or activity receiving Federal financial assistance” statute.”

For more detail see Diligent Reporting Through 500+ Open Letters