A system,
specced from the inside.

What this is

femfas.net is the long-form record of a single engineer's federal civil-rights litigation — pro se, against an institutional defendant, across SCOTUS, the First Circuit, and the District of Massachusetts. The site is the public docket: filings, letters, the chain-of-custody artifacts that survive an adversarial reading. Nothing on this site is theoretical. Every claim links to a filed page or a metered envelope.

Why the record exists

I didn't set out to build an archive. I set out to fix a system that was producing wrong outputs in my own life. The system happened to be a state-administered apparatus operating under federal funding. The wrong outputs happened to be life-altering. Once it became clear that the system was not going to debug itself, the only available instrument was the federal record — so I learned to use it.

Posture

The work here is engineering work. Read it the way you would read a bug report: a reproducible failure trace, a hypothesis about the failing component, a proposed fix the maintainer can apply. The tone is not adversarial; the documentation is. Every page on this site is a system-state observation, dated, sourced, and survivable under cross-examination.

How to read this site

/dockets is the index of active federal proceedings. /letters is the chronological correspondence — to the Court, to the Executive, to the agencies whose mandates the record implicates. /routine, /racketeering, /retaliations are thematic cross-cuts of the same underlying record. The /about you are reading is the entry-point narrative; the rest of the site is the source.

Where this leads

The same engineering posture that produced this record is producing a pair of axiomatic-agent products — Qnarre, an axiomatic verifier for the logic of legal complaints, and Qresev, an axiomatic evaluator for stock and portfolio strategies. Both launched as early-beta on 2026-06-01 at quantapix.com. The method is the takeaway: wrap a Lean4 kernel around LLM-backed predicates and the argument stands or falls on a checkable derivation. If the long version is the work that had to be done, the short version is the engineering practice that came out of it.

How to cite

femfas.net (2026). Federal civil-rights litigation record.
Version 2.0.0. Retrieved [DATE] from https://femfas.net/

Federal dockets:
  SCOTUS  No. 25-6878    (dismissed under Rule 39.8, 2026-04-27;
                          record-supplementation letter 2026-05-04)
  USCA1   No. 26-1346    (Status Affidavit e-filed 2026-06-12;
                          appellees' brief overdue since 2026-05-18)
  D.Mass. No. 1:26-mc-91166-DJC  (proposed complaint; petition for
                          leave pending; Doc 3 docketed 2026-04-30)

Contact

Three of these links are one author — so don't take the author's word: the federal and appellate dockets are public (PACER).