Retaliation & civil-rights deprivation

Retaliations

A thematic cross-cut on the retaliation and civil-rights-deprivation theory the filed record asserts — deprivations under 42 U.S.C. §§ 1981, 1983, and 1985 and retaliation claims under Title VI/VII, as pleaded — raised in the operative complaint that was dismissed below and is now on appeal (No. 26-1346). Nothing here has been adjudicated in the litigant’s favor; every entry links to a filed page a reader can pull and check, with the contested questions still pending.

"The deprivation is, in substance, retaliatory and discriminatory." — Supplemental Status Affidavit, 28 U.S.C. § 1746, ¶ 16 (June 17, 2026), as the affidavit asserts; no relief sought.

Complaint

The civil-rights deprivation counts, as pleaded

The operative First Amended Complaint pleads deprivations of civil rights under 42 U.S.C. §§ 1981, 1983, and 1985 (Count III) alongside Title VI/VII claims (42 U.S.C. §§ 2000d/2000e), alleging that state actors conspired to deprive the litigant of due-process and equal-protection rights and retaliated against his protected disclosures. The complaint was dismissed with prejudice below under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii) on res judicata grounds and is now on appeal in the First Circuit (No. 26-1346); these counts are asserted and contested, not adjudicated.

Filed PDF →
Letter

The retaliation predicate, as charged to the FBI

A renewed complaint to the FBI Director, filed concurrently as an exhibit in the underlying case, frames the alleged conduct under Title VI/VII (42 U.S.C. §§ 2000d/2000e), 42 U.S.C. §§ 1981, 1983, and 1985, and 18 U.S.C. § 1962, and characterizes obstruction and targeted retaliation as part of the alleged pattern. The document states the litigant’s allegations; it reflects no agency finding.

Filed PDF →
Motion

The § 1985(3) conspiracy theory in the Emergency Motion

The pending Emergency Motion for Injunction Pending Appeal states that it relies on 42 U.S.C. § 1983 as the procedural vehicle for the alleged due-process and equal-protection deprivations and on 42 U.S.C. § 1985(3) as a conspiracy cause of action against what it alleges is a coordinated multi-agency pattern, seeking only prospective administrative-mailing relief against state officials in their official capacities. The motion is pending before the First Circuit; no ruling has issued.

Filed PDF →
Affidavit

The categorical-identification bar and the deprivation chain

The Supplemental Status Affidavit (28 U.S.C. § 1746, seeking no relief) reports that on June 16, 2026 a state agency refused the litigant’s address update and license renewal solely because his only address is a Post Office box, and states this completes a closed loop the affidavit describes: no income, no alternative address; no job, no income; no identification, no job; only a PO box, no identification. The affidavit states this categorical bar forecloses not only lawful employment but every lawful means of receiving money. The same affidavit reports that more than 3,050 job applications have been submitted since 2019. These are reported developments now part of the record; nothing has been adjudicated.

Filed PDF →
Affidavit

The civil-rights complaint now pending before the AGO

The June 17, 2026 affidavit reports that the same categorical identification bar is the subject of a sworn Civil Rights Complaint filed with, and now pending before, the Massachusetts Attorney General’s Civil Rights Division on June 16, 2026, and states the affidavit was served to preserve the federal civil-rights record. The complaint is, by the affidavit’s own terms, formally pending; it reflects no finding by any office.

Filed PDF →